Tennessee Alleges Meta Ignored Own Research on Teen Harm as Trial Begins

Attorneys for the state of Tennessee told a Nashville jury on Monday that Meta Platforms' leadership deliberately ignored its own internal research detailing Instagram's harmful effects on teenagers to maximize profits. The allegations were made during opening statements in a seven-week trial that represents a significant legal challenge to the social media giant.

The State's Allegations

Representing the state, attorney Tom Cartmell argued that Meta's own researchers had repeatedly warned that certain Instagram features were leading to compulsive use, depression, eating disorders, and self-harm among teens. He told the jury that the company was aware of the addictive nature of its platform, which leverages unpredictable notifications to trigger dopamine responses in the brain.

Cartmell presented a 2017 internal document in which Meta product managers allegedly acknowledged that features designed to maximize engagement were "inherently at odds with well-being" and that a public warning was needed. The state's lawyers argued that despite this, Meta failed to disable or alter key features, including:

• Autoplay videos
• Push notifications
• Infinite scroll feeds

"This warning never came," Cartmell said, according to a Reuters report of the proceedings.

Meta's Defense

Ad

In response, an attorney for Meta, Kevin Huff, countered that the internal documents cited by the state are evidence that the company actively seeks to identify and fix problems on its platforms. He asserted that Meta has been transparent about the risks teens face online and has developed tools to help mitigate problematic use.

Huff argued that protecting young users is a shared societal responsibility and that Meta should not be held solely accountable for complex issues like teen addiction and mental health. "It takes a village," he told the jury, emphasizing the company's efforts to empower parents and teachers.

Broader Legal Scrutiny

The Tennessee lawsuit, filed by Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti, is one of many legal battles Meta is fighting across the United States. Nearly every state has sued the company over the alleged impact of its platforms on children, with many of those cases consolidated in a multidistrict litigation in San Francisco.

This is the second such state case to reach a jury. Earlier this year, a New Mexico jury found Meta liable in a similar lawsuit and ordered it to pay $375 million. If the Tennessee jury finds Meta liable, the trial will move to a second phase where a judge will determine potential financial penalties and whether to mandate changes to Instagram's design.