California Settles With Paramount, Clearing Path for Warner Bros. Merger Amid Criticism

California has reached a settlement with Paramount Skydance, resolving a state lawsuit and clearing a significant hurdle for the company's planned $110 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery. The agreement, however, has ignited immediate and forceful criticism from antitrust advocates, politicians, and legal experts who argue the deal harms competition and that the state secured insufficient concessions.

Terms of the Settlement

California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced the settlement on Monday, stating it would result in more production within the state. Notably, the agreement does not include structural remedies, such as forcing Paramount to sell off cable channels or valuable intellectual property like the "Top Gun" or "Harry Potter" franchises.

Instead, the settlement relies on temporary behavioral commitments that expire in three to five years. Key terms include:

• A pledge by Paramount to release 30 movies annually, with a $30 million penalty for each film short of that target.
• The creation of independent editorial boards for the news divisions of CNN and CBS.
• A commitment to negotiate separately with television distributors.

Widespread Backlash

Ad

Critics swiftly condemned the agreement, accusing state officials of yielding to corporate pressure after Paramount reportedly threatened to relocate if the lawsuit proceeded. U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren called the settlement an "anti-monopoly disaster that will result in higher prices and fewer jobs," adding that Paramount is a "clear candidate for antitrust scrutiny in a future pro-competition administration."

Alvaro Bedoya, a former Federal Trade Commission member now with the American Economic Liberties Project, said the deal would lead to layoffs and more expensive cable bills and movie tickets. John Bergmayer of the advocacy group Public Knowledge stated the merger "leaves fewer studios competing for scripts and talent" and gives the combined entity greater power over distributors, ultimately harming both consumers and creative workers.

Context and Justification

In a press conference, Attorney General Bonta conceded the settlement is "not a vote of support" for the acquisition and acknowledged that the merger "does not serve competition well." However, he defended the deal as a pragmatic way to secure production commitments in California. Paramount CEO David Ellison said the merger will strengthen competition and benefit both consumers and employees, according to Reuters.

The deal also had some industry support. Cinema United, a trade group representing major theater owners including AMC and Regal, had previously urged Bonta to seek a settlement to avoid further disruption in the film industry.