USDA Relocation Plan Sparks Fears of Mass Resignations, Program Disruptions

A Trump administration plan to relocate thousands of U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) employees from the Washington D.C. area is threatening to trigger mass resignations that could disrupt critical trade, research, and nutrition programs, according to union surveys and interviews with federal staff reported by Reuters.

Widespread Staff Opposition

The USDA intends to move more than half of its 4,600 Washington-based employees to regional offices as part of a broader government restructuring. However, surveys of affected staff suggest an overwhelming majority do not plan to relocate, citing family obligations, spousal employment, and a lack of transparency from agency leadership.

Union data highlights the scale of the potential staff exodus:

• A survey of Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS) employees found that over 71% would leave the agency if their position was moved, while just 3.8% said they would relocate to Kansas City.
• Within the Food and Nutrition Administration (FNA), a separate union survey revealed that 81% of staff would not move.

Collin Bradley, president of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees Local 3976, told Reuters that staff are frustrated by the lack of clear reasons for the decisions. This comes after more than 15,000 USDA staff have already left their jobs since the administration's restructuring efforts began last year.

Key Programs at Risk

Ad

The potential loss of experienced personnel could have significant consequences for several core USDA functions. Relocation notices sent in July targeted employees in divisions crucial for U.S. agricultural interests and public welfare.

Officials in the Foreign Agricultural Service, which supports U.S. diplomats and administers international food aid, were among those told to move to Kansas City. At the Agricultural Research Service, employees warned that moving scientists from a key site in Maryland could interrupt long-term projects, including tomato and strawberry breeding. Staff at the Food and Nutrition Administration, which oversees the food stamp program (SNAP), cautioned that mass departures could lead to program interruptions due to unsustainable workloads for the remaining employees.

Legal and Political Pushback

The reorganization has drawn formal opposition from unions and lawmakers. In early July, several unions filed a lawsuit against the USDA to halt the plan, arguing that the resulting staff departures would leave the agency unable to fulfill its mission. The USDA has declined to comment on the ongoing litigation.

On the political front, Senator Amy Klobuchar and 19 other senators sent a letter to the Deputy Secretary of Agriculture expressing concern over the plan's impact on the Rural Development agency. According to the letter, 60% of that agency's positions are slated for relocation to St. Louis or Dallas. This is not the first such move; a previous relocation of USDA positions to Kansas City during the first Trump administration resulted in significant staff attrition, a precedent that informs current concerns.