Story

US Appeals Court Reinstates Pentagon's Journalist Escort Policy

ENTHMSVIIDZHZH-TWJAKOHI
Jul 17, 20262 min read
US Appeals Court Reinstates Pentagon's Journalist Escort Policy

Summary

A federal appeals court has overturned a lower court's injunction, allowing the Pentagon to reinstate its controversial policy requiring government escorts for journalists. The ruling is a setback for The New York Times in its legal challenge over press access.

Text size
Background

A federal appeals court on Thursday sided with the U.S. government, reinstating a Pentagon policy that requires journalists to be accompanied by government escorts while at the military's headquarters. The decision reverses a lower court's order that had previously blocked the press access restrictions.

The Court's Decision

A three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit overturned an injunction issued in June by U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman. The panel stated that the Pentagon was "likely to succeed" in its argument that the escort requirement does not constitute a First Amendment violation.

The court reasoned that the policy is a "generally applicable escort requirement" and does not represent a "sufficiently adverse action to give rise to an actionable First Amendment (free speech) claim of retaliation," according to the ruling cited by Reuters.

Background of the Dispute

The legal challenge was initiated by The New York Times (NYSE: NYT) in response to access changes under the Trump administration. The policy in question, which press freedom advocates have criticized, also warned that journalists could be deemed security risks and have their press passes revoked for soliciting information from unauthorized personnel.

Sample IUX Markets – In-articleAd

The policy was met with significant opposition from media outlets. According to the source, of the 56 news organizations in the Pentagon Press Association, only one agreed to sign an acknowledgment of the policy, while other reporters surrendered their passes.

Reactions and Next Steps

The Justice Department welcomed the appeals court's order. A spokesperson for The New York Times said the newspaper was "disappointed with this interim decision" but noted that the court has expedited the appeal and that it looks forward to "litigating it on the merits."

For media companies, the ruling reintroduces operational hurdles to covering the Defense Department, potentially limiting the ability of reporters to independently gather information and conduct impromptu interviews within the Pentagon. The case will now proceed on its full merits.

Read next

More on Stocks
Back to latest news

LATEST