Story
Lindt & Sprüngli Faces US Lawsuit Over Child Labor Allegations in Cocoa Supply Chain

Summary
Swiss chocolate maker Lindt & Sprüngli has been sued in a U.S. federal court, with the lawsuit alleging the company misleads consumers about the use of child labor in its West African cocoa supply chain.
Swiss chocolate maker Lindt & Sprüngli is facing a U.S. lawsuit alleging it deceives consumers about its use of child labor in its cocoa supply chain, despite publicly promoting its commitment to responsible sourcing. The complaint, filed by the public interest law firm International Rights Advocates, was moved to a federal court in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday.
Details of the Allegations
The lawsuit claims that Lindt profits from and has been aware of child labor in its West African supply chain for more than two decades. According to the complaint, the company sources 100% of its consumer-grade cocoa beans from Ghana and also sources cocoa butter from the Ivory Coast, regions long associated with the practice.
The core of the legal challenge is the assertion that Lindt's marketing and corporate responsibility statements are misleading. The complaint argues that a "reasonable consumer" would not expect a company touting its ethical and socially responsible conduct to have widespread child labor in its supply chain. The lawsuit seeks to end Lindt's alleged "unlawful conduct" but is not seeking monetary damages.
Lindt's Response and Stated Policies
In a statement, a spokesperson for Lindt & Sprüngli said the company "takes the issue of child labor very seriously and strongly condemns all forms of child labor and denies the allegations in the complaint." The spokesperson added that Lindt has supplier protocols and systematically investigates suspected cases within its supply chain.
AdThe Kilchberg, Switzerland-based company publicly outlines its efforts in a 2030 Sustainability Plan and a "Modern Slavery Statement." These documents detail a strategy to reduce child labor risks, including its use of the Rainforest Alliance certification for farming practices.
Broader Context and Implications
This case is part of a wider legal effort targeting major corporations over supply chain ethics. International Rights Advocates has previously filed similar lawsuits against other major chocolate producers, including Mars, Mondelez, and Nestle, as well as companies in other sectors like Apple and Starbucks over alleged forced labor.
Terry Collingsworth, the executive director of the law firm, stated that his research indicated Lindt, like other major cocoa companies, has "great paper policies and virtually no implementation, particularly on the child labor issue." The lawsuit underscores the growing legal and reputational risks for global companies as consumers and regulators increase their scrutiny of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) claims.
Read next
More on Stocks
European Telecoms Face AI-Driven Price Pressure, Bank of America Warns
Bank of America analysts report that while AI agents could increase customer churn for European telecom operators by simplifying price comparisons, the technology also offers powerful tools for sales and personalized customer retention.

ShinyHunters Hackers Renew Attacks on Oracle PeopleSoft Flaw, Google's Mandiant Reports
Google's cybersecurity unit, Mandiant, reports that the hacking group ShinyHunters has resumed and adapted its exploitation of a known vulnerability in Oracle's PeopleSoft enterprise software, targeting organizations that failed to apply a full security patch.

Manulife Stock Climbs, Supported by Cross-Border Investor Optimism
Shares of Manulife Financial gained on Tuesday, buoyed by a strong performance in U.S. markets rather than any specific company news. The stock's move is also supported by a bullish technical posture and positive analyst ratings.

Escondida Union Rejects BHP's Bid to Pause Talks After Fatal Accident
A union at the world's largest copper mine, Escondida, has rejected a request from operator BHP to postpone contract negotiations following a fatal accident earlier this week. The union accused the company of using the tragedy to delay the collective bargaining process.