Story
Appeals Court Revives 'Maximum Strength' Claims in Decongestant Lawsuit

Summary
A U.S. federal appeals court has partially revived nationwide litigation, allowing consumers to sue major drugmakers and retailers over 'maximum strength' labels on oral decongestants containing the allegedly ineffective ingredient phenylephrine.
A federal appeals court on Thursday partially revived a major lawsuit against leading drugmakers and retailers, allowing consumers to proceed with some false advertising claims over popular over-the-counter decongestants. The ruling focuses on products containing oral phenylephrine, an ingredient an FDA advisory panel found to be ineffective.
The Court's Ruling
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan determined that while most state-law claims were preempted by federal regulations, consumers could pursue litigation related to specific marketing language. The three-judge panel revived claims concerning products labeled "maximum strength," arguing that companies added this unregulated phrase on their own initiative.
The court also allowed claims to proceed for brand-name drugs approved through the federal New Drug Application process. According to the ruling, manufacturers of these drugs had the ability to update their labels to reflect emerging scientific evidence on phenylephrine's ineffectiveness. However, the court affirmed the dismissal of a civil racketeering claim, stating consumers lacked legal standing.
Market Impact and Next Steps
The decision reopens legal risk for a wide range of publicly traded companies that were defendants in the consolidated litigation, which comprises about 100 lawsuits. The case now returns to U.S. District Judge Brian Cogan in Brooklyn, who had previously dismissed it in October 2024.
Key companies named in the litigation include:
Ad- Drugmakers: Procter & Gamble (PG), Haleon (HLN), Bayer (BAYGn), GSK, and Kenvue (KVUE).
- Retailers: CVS (CVS), Walmart (WMT), Target (TGT), Costco (COST), and Walgreens.
Jonathan Selbin, a lawyer representing the consumers, stated the case is "far from over," asserting that manufacturers sold products they knew were ineffective. The defendants' lawyers did not immediately comment on the ruling.
Background on Phenylephrine
The lawsuits followed a landmark finding in September 2023 by a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory panel, which concluded that oral phenylephrine was no more effective than a placebo as a nasal decongestant. Following that finding, the FDA proposed in November 2024 to remove the ingredient's classification as safe and effective for over-the-counter oral use.
In the court's opinion, Circuit Judge Denny Chin acknowledged that the legal limitations on consumer remedies might seem unfair. However, he wrote, "The fix, however, must flow not from litigation but from the FDA."
Read next
More on Stocks
HIVE Digital Stock Climbs on Continued Momentum From Bullish Analyst Coverage
Shares of HIVE Digital Technologies gained on Friday, extending a rally fueled by a new 'Buy' rating from Jones Trading and a broader Wall Street consensus on the company's pivot to AI infrastructure.

Westlake Stock Slides on German Plant Closure, Weaker Q3 Outlook
Westlake shares fell after the chemical maker announced it will permanently close a German PVC plant, incurring a $205 million charge, and warned of lower sequential financial performance for the third quarter.

OpenAI Nears $70 Billion in Annualized Revenue, Boosting Oracle Shares
The AI developer's annualized revenue run rate is approaching $70 billion, fueled by a rapid increase in enterprise sales since July, according to a source. The report lifted shares of key infrastructure partner Oracle.

Kraken Robotics Hits 52-Week Low as Acquisition Concerns Linger
Shares of Kraken Robotics touched a new 52-week low as investor uncertainty over the integration of its recent Covelya Group acquisition and a negative analyst action continued to weigh on sentiment.