Southern Glazer's Agrees to Pricing Restrictions in FTC Settlement

Southern Glazer’s, the largest U.S. liquor and wine distributor, has agreed to restrictions on its pricing practices to settle a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) lawsuit that alleged it illegally favored large chain stores over smaller, independent retailers. The agreement, disclosed by a senior FTC official on Friday, requires the company to level the playing field between its largest and smallest customers.

Terms of the Settlement

Under the terms of the settlement, Southern Glazer’s will be subject to new pricing rules for a period of six years. According to the FTC official, the key provisions include:

• The company is prohibited from charging small retailers in 26 states prices that are significantly higher than those offered to nearby large chain stores.
• An independent monitor will be appointed to oversee the company's compliance with the agreement.
• Southern Glazer's will face penalties if it violates the terms of the settlement.

The company, which distributes major brands like Bacardi and Smirnoff, had previously denied that its discount structures violated any laws.

Background on the FTC Case

Ad

The settlement resolves a complaint filed by the FTC in 2024, which accused Southern Glazer’s of violating the Robinson-Patman Act. This 1936 law is aimed at preventing anti-competitive price discrimination.

The FTC alleged that the distributor provided exclusive discounts to major retailers, including grocery chains like Kroger and alcohol retailer Total Wine & More, that were not available to their smaller competitors. The case represented the first time in several decades that the agency had actively enforced the Robinson-Patman Act.

Regulatory Context and Implications

The enforcement action was a stated priority for former FTC Chair Lina Khan and signals the agency's renewed focus on price discrimination and affordability issues. This settlement may serve as a precedent for how the FTC addresses volume-based discounts and promotional allowances that could disadvantage smaller businesses.

However, the original lawsuit was met with some internal dissent at the commission. Current FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson had voted against suing Southern Glazer’s in 2024, stating at the time that he believed the case was weak, despite his view that the agency should enforce the act.