Fed Reportedly Plans to Raise Asset Thresholds for Stricter Bank Oversight

The U.S. Federal Reserve is developing a plan to raise the asset thresholds that trigger more stringent regulatory oversight for banks, according to four people with knowledge of the discussions. The move would adjust the existing framework to account for economic growth and inflation, potentially easing compliance costs for several large lenders and creating more room for expansion.

Details of the Proposed Changes

The central bank is expected to propose re-indexing the thresholds later this year, the sources said. Under current rules established in 2019, banks face progressively stricter requirements—including stress tests, liquidity, and capital rules—as they cross asset levels of $100 billion, $250 billion, and $700 billion.

According to the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, the plan involves adjusting these tiers upward. Key proposed changes include:

• Raising the highest threshold from $700 billion to closer to $1 trillion.
• Lifting the trigger for some of the requirements in the lowest category from $100 billion to approximately $150 billion.

A spokesperson for the Federal Reserve declined to comment on the matter. The plan aligns with public remarks made in January by Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman, who suggested the central bank would consider re-indexing the thresholds.

Market Impact and Industry Reaction

Ad

Adjusting the thresholds would have significant implications for the banking sector, particularly for regional lenders approaching the current limits. Banks argue that crossing these asset levels requires tens of millions of dollars in annual spending on compliance, risk management, and reporting infrastructure.

Lenders nearing the $700 billion mark, such as U.S. Bancorp, Capital One, PNC Financial, and Truist, would gain more runway for growth before facing the toughest Fed oversight. Meanwhile, banks like Western Alliance and Zions could expand beyond $100 billion without immediately incurring the associated regulatory costs. The changes could also spur a wave of mergers and acquisitions among mid-size banks that have been hesitant to grow for fear of breaching the current thresholds.

Regulatory Context

The current supervisory framework stems from the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, which was later amended by Congress in 2018 to soften some requirements. The law grants the Fed significant discretion in tailoring its oversight. The banking industry has long contended that the fixed asset thresholds are arbitrary and fail to keep pace with the economy, distorting business decisions.

Critics of the potential changes argue that easing these rules could increase systemic risk and reduce competition, ultimately harming consumers. Proponents, including a spokesperson for U.S. Bancorp, maintain that updated rules would help consumers and businesses by increasing bank lending capacity and competition.