Story
JPMorgan's Dimon Accuses Regulators of Using 'False' Calculations for Capital Rules

Summary
JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon blasted proposed U.S. bank capital rules as "unfair" and based on "false" calculations, arguing they disproportionately penalize large, diversified banks while favoring Wall Street trading firms.
JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon intensified his criticism of forthcoming U.S. bank capital rules, arguing during a quarterly earnings call on Tuesday that regulators are using "false" calculations to artificially inflate requirements. Dimon stated the proposals are "unfair" and would penalize large, diversified banks like his own.
'Unfair' and 'False' Numbers
Speaking after the bank reported a record second-quarter profit, Dimon claimed the proposed methods for calculating the capital banks must hold to absorb losses are being manipulated. "They should not do the numbers in a false way to make the number higher," he said, according to a Reuters report of the call. "The number should be the number."
JPMorgan has previously estimated that under the new drafts, it would face a capital increase of roughly 4%. In contrast, the bank projects that its competitors would see an average capital reduction of 4.8%, a disparity Dimon believes gives an advantage to Wall Street trading giants.
Focus on GSIB Surcharge
The CEO's primary target is the calculation of the GSIB surcharge, an additional capital buffer required for the nation's most systemically important banks. Dimon has long advocated for the Federal Reserve to adjust the surcharge's formula to fully account for economic growth since its implementation in 2015, which would reduce the perceived systemic footprint of large lenders.
AdJPMorgan also highlighted a proposed change to how short-term wholesale funding reliance is treated in the surcharge calculation. This change is expected to benefit firms like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, which are more reliant on this type of funding than commercial banks with large deposit bases. JPMorgan CFO Jeremy Barnum said this outcome would be "disproportionately damaging the ability of banks to serve Main Street."
Regulatory Context
The comments underscore ongoing tension between the nation's largest bank and federal regulators, who are working to finalize a sweeping set of capital proposals. The current drafts are widely seen as more favorable to the industry than a stricter version introduced in 2023, which was met with significant industry opposition.
Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman has said she aims to complete the rulemaking process by the end of the year. The proposals are being finalized by the Fed along with two other federal banking agencies.
Read next
More on Stocks
ExxonMobil in Advanced Talks for Venezuela Return, Eyeing Former Orinoco Project
The U.S. oil major is reportedly negotiating a return to the Petromonagas heavy oil project, a significant reversal nearly two decades after its assets were nationalized by the Venezuelan government.

US House Passes Bill Targeting Data Center Power Grid Costs
The U.S. House of Representatives has advanced the Ratepayer Protection Act, the first legislation of its kind aimed at making large power users like data centers bear the costs of new electricity infrastructure.

New Zealand's Q2 GDP Growth Exceeds Forecasts but Remains Tepid at 0.2%
New Zealand's economy grew 0.2% in the second quarter, topping analyst and central bank forecasts, according to official data. However, the pace of expansion remains slow amid persistent economic headwinds and recent interest rate hikes.

Snap Partners With Salesforce, Nvidia to Target Enterprise Market With AR Glasses
Snap Inc. has announced strategic partnerships with Salesforce, Nvidia, and Amazon Web Services to integrate enterprise-grade AI and software tools into its Specs augmented-reality glasses, signaling a major push into the corporate market.