Story

SEC Proposes Scaling Back Sarbanes-Oxley Auditor Requirements

ENTHMSVIIDZHZH-TWJAKOHI
Sep 29, 20262 min read
SEC Proposes Scaling Back Sarbanes-Oxley Auditor Requirements

Summary

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission plans to reduce the number of companies required to have external auditors verify internal financial controls, a key post-Enron investor protection.

Text size
Background

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has proposed a significant rollback of an audit rule established by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The plan would reduce the number of public companies required to have an external auditor attest to the effectiveness of their internal financial controls, a key protection enacted following the collapse of Enron in 2001.

Details of the Proposal

The proposed change would exempt a large swath of publicly traded companies from the auditor attestation requirement. Key changes include:

  • Exempting all companies with a public float below $2 billion.
  • Exempting all companies for their first five years after an initial public offering (IPO), regardless of their size.

Under the new framework, approximately 1,100 of the largest public companies, representing about 94% of total U.S. market value, would remain subject to the rule. All public companies would still be legally required to maintain strong internal financial controls and have management certify them in filings.

Rationale and Financial Impact

Sample IUX Markets – In-articleAd

According to SEC Chair Paul Atkins, the proposal is aimed at "making IPOs great again" by reducing regulatory costs that may deter private companies from going public. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Nasdaq have both expressed support for the measure, with the Chamber describing the current rules as "disproportionately expensive and regressive."

A Government Accountability Office (GAO) report cited in the source estimated that auditor attestation accounts for 13% to 19% of a company's total audit bill. For the roughly 1,600 companies that would become newly exempt, the total annual savings could be between $400 million and $600 million.

Investor Protection Concerns

The proposal faces opposition from investor groups and audit firms, who argue it weakens critical safeguards. According to data from Ideagen Audit Analytics, the same smaller companies that would be exempted under the new rule have historically accounted for 60% to 80% of annual financial restatements.

This data also indicates these firms are more likely to report material weaknesses in their internal controls. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was originally passed to restore investor confidence after accounting scandals, and critics fear that easing its requirements could increase risks for investors in smaller-cap companies.

Read next

More on Stocks
Back to latest news

LATEST