Story
Defense Sector ETFs Enter Oversold Territory Amid Heavy Selling

Summary
Major exchange-traded funds tracking the U.S. aerospace and defense industry have seen a sharp downturn, pushing a key technical indicator into oversold territory and signaling intense recent selling pressure.
Major exchange-traded funds (ETFs) tracking the U.S. aerospace and defense sector have entered technically oversold territory following a period of significant selling pressure. According to data from Investing.com, the 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) for several of the industry's largest funds has fallen well below the 30 level, a threshold often monitored by technical analysts for potential valuation shifts.
Widespread Selling Hits Major US Funds
The downturn has been most pronounced in the largest and most widely held passive ETFs that provide broad exposure to the U.S. defense industry. The sell-off has resulted in steep three-month drawdowns and historically low RSI readings.
- iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA): Down 13.6% over the past three months with an RSI of 22.1.
- Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA): Down 11.5% over the same period with an RSI of 19.9.
- SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR): Has seen the sharpest recent decline, falling 17.8% over three months and pushing its RSI to 18.4.
An RSI reading below 30 is typically interpreted by market technicians as a sign that an asset has been heavily sold and may be undervalued. The source material suggests these declines could be linked to macroeconomic headwinds, such as defense budget uncertainty and sensitivity to interest rates.
Diverging Performance Highlights Sector Shifts
Despite the broad weakness, several specialized defense ETFs have demonstrated notable resilience, highlighting different trends within the sector. The performance of funds with a focus on defense technology, active management, or European markets has diverged from their U.S.-centric peers.
AdTech and European Funds Outperform
The Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD), which focuses on areas like cybersecurity and drones, has bucked the trend by posting a 1.2% gain over the last three months. Meanwhile, the Select STOXX Europe Aerospace & Defense UCITS ETF (EUAD) has remained nearly flat, a performance that may reflect increased defense spending commitments among European nations.
Furthermore, the actively managed iShares Defense Industrials & Tech Active ETF (IDEF) is the only fund in the analyzed group with a positive year-to-date return, up 1.9%, according to the data.
Key Fund Metrics
For investors monitoring the sector, the largest funds by assets under management (AUM) are ITA ($12.3 billion), PPA ($8.1 billion), and SHLD ($6.6 billion). In terms of cost, the SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) is the most inexpensive option listed, with an expense ratio of 0.35%, followed by the iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) at 0.42%.
Read next
More on Stocks
Northrop Grumman Stock Nears 52-Week Low After Losing Key Navy Fighter Contract to Boeing
Northrop Grumman's stock fell sharply after the Pentagon awarded the multibillion-dollar F/A-XX fighter contract to rival Boeing, raising questions about the defense giant's long-term growth in the manned fighter aircraft segment.

European Bank Rally Bifurcates, Shifting Focus to Value Plays Like BNP Paribas
As the broad rally in European banks matures, investors are shifting focus from momentum stocks to undervalued lenders. Data shows French bank BNP Paribas trading at a significant discount despite strong fundamentals, signaling a new phase of stock selection in the sector.

Anthropic's IPO Filing Reveals $2 Trillion Ambition and 'Existential Risk' Warnings
AI firm Anthropic is planning a record-breaking IPO at a $2 trillion valuation, but its draft prospectus warns that its own technology could pose "catastrophic or existential risks to humanity," according to a report.

Alphabet Shares Pare Gains on Report of Internal Doubts Over Gemini 4 AI
Alphabet stock lost momentum Wednesday after a report detailed internal employee skepticism about the real-world performance of its upcoming Gemini 4 AI model. Google has disputed the characterization, calling claims of underperformance inaccurate.