US House Speaker Johnson Rejects AI Moratorium, Citing China Competition

U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson on Tuesday rejected the idea of a moratorium on artificial intelligence development, arguing such a move would hand a critical competitive advantage to China and pose a national security risk. Johnson advocated for self-regulation by the industry and announced an upcoming White House meeting with top AI executives.

Stance on Regulation

Speaking to reporters, Johnson stated that AI companies are capable of managing their own pace of innovation without direct government mandates to halt progress. "They can self-regulate. They don’t need the government to tell them to slow it down. If they want to slow it down, they should," he said, according to a Reuters report.

This position signals a preference for a lighter regulatory touch from Washington, a development likely to be welcomed by major technology firms heavily invested in AI. Johnson also rejected the idea of a transnational agency to regulate the technology.

National Security Concerns

The Speaker's primary justification for opposing a development pause is the strategic competition with Beijing. "We cannot have a moratorium on the development of AI... Because then we will lose our edge to China, and that has serious national security implications for every American family," Johnson stated.

Ad

He added that he was sure the topic of AI would be part of discussions between President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping during their planned meeting in Washington later this month.

White House to Meet with AI Leaders

Following a conversation with President Trump on Monday night, Johnson confirmed that executives from major AI providers—described as "all the big names that you know"—are being summoned to the White House for an important meeting within the next week.

While opposing a moratorium, Johnson did suggest a "balanced and thoughtful" approach to oversight was necessary. He proposed potential "guardrails" for the industry, including:

• The use of independent auditors.
• A requirement for transparency from AI developers.