Story
Pentagon CTO Warns Against Government Stakes in AI Companies
Summary
The Pentagon's chief technology officer advised against the U.S. government taking ownership stakes in private AI firms, advocating for a market-driven approach with limited regulatory oversight.
The Department of Defense's chief technology officer, Emil Michael, stated Wednesday that the U.S. government should not pursue nationalization or partial ownership of artificial intelligence companies. Speaking to CNBC, Michael argued that direct government involvement would not be beneficial for the rapidly advancing sector.
Stance on Government Ownership
Michael cautioned against government intervention in the AI industry, where U.S. companies are among the largest global leaders. "We don't want government to get in the middle," he said, adding that nationalization "doesn't really go well" for such industries, according to the report.
The comments come as the Trump administration has previously taken direct stakes in private-sector companies. These actions include acquiring a reported 10% stake in Intel and a golden share in U.S. Steel.
Views on AI Regulation
Beyond ownership, Michael also expressed opposition to increased government regulatory oversight of AI companies. He highlighted the debate between pre-regulating the technology, similar to Europe's approach, and holding companies accountable for developing safe products before their release.
AdWhile acknowledging that a recent hack of Hugging Face was concerning, he questioned what type of regulation could have prevented such an incident. Michael suggested that existing laws from the Federal Trade Commission would be enforced and that companies could voluntarily pause activities to resolve issues, rather than face broad mandates.
Market Implications
The CTO's position signals a preference for a free-market approach to AI development, a stance that could reduce investor uncertainty about direct government interference or dilution of equity in leading tech firms. Michael's comments aligned with President Trump's recent pushback against calls for an AI slowdown, which he reportedly described as a "hoax and scam."
Michael suggested there is a "coordinated campaign to create fear" that could lead to irrational decisions benefiting certain incumbent companies in the AI industry. He warned against placing complete trust in a few AI executives to self-regulate, indicating a complex balance between corporate responsibility and government policy.
Read next
More on Stocks
ExxonMobil in Advanced Talks for Venezuela Return, Eyeing Former Orinoco Project
The U.S. oil major is reportedly negotiating a return to the Petromonagas heavy oil project, a significant reversal nearly two decades after its assets were nationalized by the Venezuelan government.
US House Passes Bill Targeting Data Center Power Grid Costs
The U.S. House of Representatives has advanced the Ratepayer Protection Act, the first legislation of its kind aimed at making large power users like data centers bear the costs of new electricity infrastructure.
New Zealand's Q2 GDP Growth Exceeds Forecasts but Remains Tepid at 0.2%
New Zealand's economy grew 0.2% in the second quarter, topping analyst and central bank forecasts, according to official data. However, the pace of expansion remains slow amid persistent economic headwinds and recent interest rate hikes.
Snap Partners With Salesforce, Nvidia to Target Enterprise Market With AR Glasses
Snap Inc. has announced strategic partnerships with Salesforce, Nvidia, and Amazon Web Services to integrate enterprise-grade AI and software tools into its Specs augmented-reality glasses, signaling a major push into the corporate market.