US Government Backs OpenAI in New York Times Copyright Lawsuit

The Trump administration has formally sided with OpenAI in its high-stakes copyright battle against The New York Times, arguing that training large language models (LLMs) on copyrighted works is generally a protected 'fair use' of that material. The position was detailed in an advisory brief filed in Manhattan federal court on Tuesday, marking the U.S. government's first official intervention in the wave of lawsuits brought by content creators against artificial intelligence companies.

The Government's Argument

The brief, while not legally binding, asserts that the government has a significant interest in seeing the court reject claims that AI training inherently violates copyright law. It argues that the process is "extraordinarily" transformative and essential for national progress.

According to the filing, the administration's key concerns include:

• Scientific Advancement: The brief notes that LLMs are already contributing to major research breakthroughs.
• National Security: U.S. Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward stated that "AI dominance is critical to promote national security."
• Economic Prosperity: The government contends that limiting LLM development would hinder American prosperity and economic mobility.

Broader Implications

Ad

This filing could provide significant support for OpenAI, Microsoft, and other technology companies facing similar lawsuits from authors, publishers, and music labels. The central legal question in these cases is whether using vast amounts of copyrighted data for AI training qualifies as transformative 'fair use' under U.S. law. The government's brief directly supports the tech industry's interpretation.

Adding to the administration's stance, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told G20 officials that countries should embrace fair use for AI training while also developing methods to "protect artists." The brief itself warns that a restrictive ruling "would thwart such creative and scientific progress while hindering American prosperity."

Case Background

The New York Times filed its lawsuit in 2023, accusing OpenAI and its primary financial backer, Microsoft, of using millions of its articles without permission to train the models that power ChatGPT. The case is one of dozens that pit copyright holders against AI developers, with the 'fair use' doctrine emerging as the pivotal legal battleground. Previous judicial rulings on the matter have been divided, making the government's official opinion a potentially influential factor in future court decisions.