Story
Senate Blocks Landmark Crypto Bill in Major Setback for Industry Lobby

A landmark bill aimed at creating a regulatory framework for the U.S. cryptocurrency market failed to advance in the Senate on Tuesday, marking a significant setback for a digital asset industry that has spent hundreds of millions to influence Washington.
Senators voted 49-50 against moving forward with the Clarity Act, a procedural defeat widely seen as fatal to the bill's prospects this session. The legislation was designed to provide legal certainty for the $2 trillion crypto market, but it faced unified opposition from Democrats and a handful of Republicans.
Limits of Political Spending Exposed
The defeat is particularly notable given the crypto industry's massive political investment. The sector has spent more than $300 million combined on the 2024 and 2026 election cycles to support crypto-friendly candidates and advocate for favorable policy, according to the report.
Despite this spending, the bill faltered against a combination of partisan politics and opposition from established lobbying groups. While the industry has vowed to continue its fight, analysts told Reuters the vote demonstrates the limits of its influence. "The politics here changed slightly in a way that made it less difficult for the Democrats to vote against it," said Ian Katz, managing director at Capital Alpha Partners.
Partisanship and Banking Opposition Proved Decisive
AdTwo key factors contributed to the bill's failure. First, President Donald Trump's personal financial dealings in cryptocurrency reportedly hardened Democratic opposition. A June report that Trump earned over $1.4 billion from his family's crypto ventures intensified Democratic demands for stricter ethics rules for officeholders, making bipartisan consensus difficult to achieve.
Second, the crypto industry faced a formidable opponent in the banking lobby. Banking groups argued that a provision in the bill could create harmful competition for customer deposits and mobilized their national network to oppose it, successfully persuading some Republicans to vote no. "The challenge for the industry is that this has become a partisan issue," said Brian Gardner, chief Washington policy strategist at Stifel.
Voter Priorities and Industry Image
The setback also highlights a potential disconnect between the industry's priorities and those of the broader electorate. An April Politico poll cited in the report found that just 18% of respondents believe lawmakers should prioritize crypto rules, far behind issues like affordable housing.
Some lawmakers have successfully used their opponents' ties to the crypto industry as a point of attack. Ahead of the vote, Senator Elizabeth Warren told Reuters that campaign spending from the sector may not be as effective as believed. "The American people like to hear from a candidate who says, 'I can’t be bought,'" she said.
Read next
More on Stocks
FTC Orders Walmart, Uber, Delta to Disclose Data on Personalized Pricing
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission is demanding nine major companies, including leading retail, travel, and gig economy firms, to provide information on how they use consumer data for setting individual prices and wages.

Google Launches Gemini 4 Carbon AI Model to Bolster Cybersecurity Capabilities
Alphabet's Google has unveiled Gemini 4 Carbon, its latest AI model specifically designed for advanced cybersecurity tasks like vulnerability detection and secure code generation. The launch escalates competition with rivals OpenAI and Anthropic in the enterprise AI market.

Oracle Shares Surge After Unveiling $225 Billion Revenue Target for 2030
Oracle stock rose sharply after the company presented a long-term financial outlook targeting at least $225 billion in annual revenue by fiscal 2030, driven by its expanding AI infrastructure business.

DOJ Scrutinizes Nvidia's $12.9B Hugging Face Deal Amid Broader Antitrust Probe, Sources Say
The U.S. Department of Justice is reportedly examining Nvidia's planned $12.93 billion acquisition of AI platform Hugging Face as part of a wider, ongoing antitrust investigation into the chipmaker's market conduct.