NYC Law Requiring Food Delivery Apps to Share Customer Data Ruled Unconstitutional by Appeals Court

A federal appeals court on Wednesday declared a New York City law requiring food delivery companies to share customer data with restaurants to be unconstitutional. The decision, issued by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan, marks a significant victory for third-party delivery platforms in their ongoing regulatory disputes with local governments.

The Court's Ruling

The ruling invalidates a city ordinance that mandated platforms like Uber Eats, DoorDash, and Grubhub to turn over customer information, such as names, phone numbers, and addresses, to restaurants upon request. The court sided with the argument that this compulsory sharing of proprietary data was improper.

According to a report from Reuters, the decision was handed down on August 5. The now-voided law was part of a package of legislation passed by New York City aimed at regulating the food delivery industry and supporting local restaurants that had become heavily reliant on these services.

Ad

Industry Impact and Context

This ruling is a crucial win for food delivery aggregators, whose customer data is a core and highly valuable business asset. This information is central to their marketing efforts, user analytics, and competitive advantage, allowing them to build direct relationships with a wide consumer base that individual restaurants struggle to reach.

For investors, the decision removes a key regulatory risk for publicly traded food delivery companies operating in one of their largest markets. The ruling could also set a legal precedent, potentially discouraging other municipalities across the U.S. from enacting similar data-sharing laws and reinforcing the platforms' control over their user data.