Crypto Industry Spends $176 Million on Midterm Elections to Secure Favorable Regulation

The cryptocurrency industry has spent approximately $176 million across more than 100 midterm races this election cycle, according to campaign finance filings. The spending campaign is part of a multi-year strategy to build a bipartisan coalition in Congress aimed at shaping future regulation for the $2.75 trillion digital asset market.

This financial push is designed to secure long-term legislative stability as the industry prepares for a potential shift in the political landscape after the Trump administration. The spending is not just about winning elections but about establishing relationships and influence to guide policy for years to come, strategists involved in the effort told Reuters.

A Strategic Spending Blitz

The majority of the spending has been directed by Fairshake, the industry's largest super political action committee (PAC), and its affiliates. According to campaign finance records through October 20, Fairshake-related groups have spent about $150.8 million, with other crypto-focused groups contributing an additional $25 million.

Key details of the strategy include:

• Primary Funders: The effort is primarily financed by industry giants including crypto exchange Coinbase, blockchain firm Ripple, and venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz.
• High Success Rate: Fairshake reported that 53 of the 58 candidates it backed in primary or special elections this year won and will be on the November 3 ballot.
• Targeted Messaging: Advertisements funded by the PACs often avoid mentioning cryptocurrency, instead focusing on broader issues like taxes and immigration. They are frequently run by affiliate PACs with generic names such as "Defend American Jobs" and "Protect Progress."

"We back pro-crypto candidates who support American innovation in both parties, and look forward to continuing to build on the largest pro-crypto caucus in American history," said Geoff Vetter, a spokesperson for Fairshake.

The Push for Regulatory Clarity

Ad

The industry's political mobilization follows a period of intense scrutiny from the Biden administration and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which industry advocates termed "regulation by enforcement." This led to a strategic decision to build political capital to pass favorable legislation.

The ultimate goal is the passage of the Clarity Act, a bill that would place primary oversight of the crypto market under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which is generally viewed as a more favorable regulator than the SEC. The bill stalled in the current congressional session but remains a top priority. Without it, analysts at JPMorgan have noted that regulations established during the Trump administration could be reversed by a future one.

"It’s an investment in the future," said Colin McLaren, head of government relations at the Solana Policy Institute, which contributed $4.9 million. The effort is designed to “ensure that over the next 100 years, the crypto industry has clear rules of the road."

High-Stakes Races and Mixed Results

The industry's spending has had a significant impact on several key races, though with varying degrees of success. In Ohio, crypto-backed PACs have spent more than $68 million in the Senate race to oppose longtime industry critic Sherrod Brown. The ads have focused on personal attacks and policy positions unrelated to digital assets.

In a Maryland House Democratic primary, industry groups spent $5.3 million to support state Delegate Adrian Boafo, who raised only $1.9 million himself and went on to win. However, the strategy was less effective in Illinois, where Fairshake spent over $12 million in unsuccessful efforts to defeat Lieutenant Governor Juliana Stratton and state Representative La Shawn Ford. Ford, who was targeted after supporting state-level crypto registration, called the attacks "relentless" and "personal."