Lululemon, Kanzhun, EPAM Flagged as Undervalued in Stock Screen

A recent stock screen has highlighted three U.S.-listed companies—Lululemon Athletica, Kanzhun, and EPAM Systems—as potentially trading at a significant discount to their model-derived fair values. According to an analysis published by Investing.com, each company shows a potential upside of over 65% based on a screen that filtered for specific growth and profitability metrics.

Screening Highlights

The analysis focused on companies with market capitalizations above $2 billion, positive revenue growth, and a return on invested capital (ROIC) exceeding 10%. Per the source data, the three companies with the highest potential discount to their calculated fair value were:

• Lululemon Athletica (LULU): A potential fair value upside of 77.6%, supported by a high ROIC of 19.7% but slower recent revenue growth of 1.7%.
• Kanzhun (BZ): A potential upside of 68.7%, driven by strong revenue growth of 12.2% and an ROIC of 13.9%.
• EPAM Systems (EPAM): A potential upside of 66.5%, showing a balance of 10.8% revenue growth and a 13.6% ROIC.

Contrasting Investment Profiles

The results present distinct characteristics for investors. Lululemon stands out for its high capital efficiency, as indicated by its 19.7% ROIC, positioning it as a quality-focused name despite more modest top-line growth in the period measured.

Ad

In contrast, Kanzhun leads the trio in expansion, with its 12.2% revenue growth suggesting a profile more dependent on sustaining that momentum. EPAM Systems offers a more balanced approach, combining double-digit growth with a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 16.0x, according to the source data.

Context and Model Limitations

Investors should note that fair value figures are model-based estimates and do not represent a guaranteed return or a formal price target. The data provided was a snapshot and may not reflect live market prices.

The quantitative screen, as noted by Investing.com, does not account for qualitative factors such as management execution risk, the competitive landscape, or potential impacts from geopolitical events. The list is intended as a valuation-based starting point for further research rather than a definitive ranking.